Texas is suing General Motors for collecting driver data without consent and then selling it to insurance companies:

From CNN:

In car models from 2015 and later, the Detroit-based car manufacturer allegedly used technology to “collect, record, analyze, and transmit highly detailed driving data about each time a driver used their vehicle,” according to the AG’s statement.

General Motors sold this information to several other companies, including to at least two companies for the purpose of generating “Driving Scores” about GM’s customers, the AG alleged. The suit said those two companies then sold these scores to insurance companies.

Insurance companies can use data to see how many times people exceeded a speed limit or obeyed other traffic laws. Some insurance firms ask customers if they want to voluntarily opt-in to such programs, promising lower rates for safer drivers.

But the attorney general’s office claimed GM “deceived” its Texan customers by encouraging them to enroll in programs such as OnStar Smart Driver. But by agreeing to join these programs, customers also unknowingly agreed to the collection and sale of their data, the attorney general’s office said.

Press release. Court filing. Slashdot thread.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

NCSC’s New Mobile Risk Model Aimed at “High-Threat” Firms

May 1, 2024 0 Comments 0 tags

The UK’s National Cyber Security Centre claims its AMS model will protect firms from state-backed mobile threats

CISA Adds One Known Exploited Vulnerability to Catalog

May 29, 2024 0 Comments 0 tags

CISA has added one new vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation. CVE-2024-4978 Justice AV Solutions (JAVS) Viewer Installer Embedded Malicious Code Vulnerability These types

Congress sounds alarm on lax dam cybersecurity

April 10, 2024 0 Comments 0 tags

America’s dams lack the resources to beef up their digital defenses, and the federal agency charged with oversight of the sector is understaffed and behind on performing cyber audits, experts